Re: gEDA-user: taking issue with Symbol creation

[John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:23 PM, John Doty wrote:

>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Mark Rages wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to define some defaults (no pinseq, default to
>> pinnumber) to avoid cluttering up the symbol files in the common  
>> case?
>>  We could even use the asciibetical sorted pinnumber values and get a
>> reasonable sequence for BGA-type numbers.
>
> A default probably doesn't make sense, because if you actually need
> pinseq it's rarely related to pinnumber in any simple way. Better to
> have gnetlist complain. But most flows don't need it at all.


With the exception of slotted components, of course.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user