[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)
From: Krzysztof KoÅciuszkiewicz <k.kosciuszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:47:38 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 04:47:49 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=detoZmDkJCr8Exasultb2mwuOIQXx1331qKviZ+BP/8=; b=BT1/oN+yvxxXmUDaBfcu5zCgxs72GjgwtvhGwO4KsF90JWcj2sflQSbOBeDBYaYzbC OSxerG+JQKWlc0bK1kNSuE/5VNYsXn72FfTN7qtszKtuF7xZQkhGvB/zNxqtbnN9q2xX lWD0Wdv7ZqLem7xNI2zY/HiU5Tf+Zc49GXWQ4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GK3JGTAkZcqVaJR7jasnL/dOBgkjhaEihlkyLJpVq2yndxwiJLo1SPSbCvNqbbkvhB lIobyF10Zgx1T8VBxQeXjTOPf8WxZe36rgWEY/G5qe+qhZCB3Z+Zxxga1Mn5jZc99fvn 2zbZjSCWTEkwdWyGzSZCVH8bAT9vlOp9mgQW8=
In-reply-to: <igir57$qqu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <igir57$qqu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

2011/1/12 Kai-Martin Knaak <knaak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> â gsch2pcb wart: The net of input/output symbols is evaluated from its
> refdes. Consequently, the restrictions to refdeses apply: No uncapitalized
> suffix, no hyphen, etc. Proposal: evaluate the net from dedicated attributes.
> E.g. "in-net=", "out-net="

What would be the semantics of these attributes when attached to some
other symbol?
Should they be attached to symbol or to individual pins? What about
handling in different backends?

I would say the existing attribute/backend/semantics interaction
matrix is complex enough
to require full analysis of the implications of yet another attribute
being added...
-- 
Krzysztof KoÅciuszkiewicz
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" -- Leonardo da Vinci


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)
  - From: Kai-Martin Knaak
- Re: gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)
  - From: Stephan Boettcher

References:
- gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)
  - From: Kai-Martin Knaak

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: gschem: directly connecting two nets?
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Bugs, warts and feature requests (5)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread