Re: gEDA-user: More robust support of multi-part symbols.

[Bill Gatliff <bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve Meier wrote:
> Talking about gates and using the term slots is so 1980's.
>
> Today's issues are how are pga's supported. How are multiple logic
> levels, being able to define a pin as an input an output or
> bi-directional or differential? How are the gates logic levels defined?
>
> Let alone, how at the layout level we can do pin swapping and back
> annotation.
>
> To me geda and pcb are just falling further and further behind the state
> of the art.
>   

I can't argue that one way or the other, but support for the
fundamentals are no less important than they have ever been.


b.g.

-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user