Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.

[timecop <timecop@xxxxxxxxx>]

Because if you got any worthwhile changes to this stuff, you should
have committed them by now. If you haven't, then deal with it.

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Peter Clifton <pcjc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 23:38 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 22:17 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> > > Your patch doesn't apply cleanly to the current git head.  Could you
>> > > send me an updated one as a single git patch?
>> >
>> > Sure, find it attached.  bzipped because I didn't want to offend your
>> > inbox.
>> >
>> > I've included the script for tackling any merge failures within the
>> > commit message, so hopefully anyone who's affected will find it as soon
>> > as they have any issues.
>>
>> Pushed.  First person who complains they have an old compiler,
>> volunteers to help us test a patch to support it :-)
>
> Thanks a bloody BUNCH. The filter script in the commit message is all
> well and good for pure git users, but it will corrupt stgit branches.
>
> Why are we committing bulk NOP changes like this for anyway? Because
> they exist?
>
> --
> Peter Clifton
>
> Electrical Engineering Division,
> Engineering Department,
> University of Cambridge,
> 9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
> Cambridge
> CB3 0FA
>
> Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
> Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user