[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: New beta version of gEDA Suite CD up -- please test!
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 17:08 -0500, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> >
> > I just tried installing the gEDA/gaf Suite CD (i.e., geda-
> > install-20050325.iso) on my Fedora Core 3 installation and it fails
> > building ngspice.
> >
> > Checking config.log for ngspice, I see that there are multiple undefined
> > references. Also, libncurses, libreadline, and libgc libraries were
> > configured (I have libgc installed from a previous install of TclSpice).
>
> The install CD configures with readline enabled. Libgc is the garbage
> collection library, which you apparently have on your system. It is
> autosensed by ngspice's configure script.
>
> >
> > Uninstalling the latest version (version 6.4) of the Boehm-Demers-Weiser
> > conservative garbage collector (i.e., libgc) resolves this issue and the
> > build is successful.
>
> Interesting report! Thank you!
>
> Just to make it clear -- you are saying that ngspice's configure
> script found that you had the Boehm-Weiser Conservative Garbage
> Collector installed on your system and configured it in. Then,
> ngspice died during "make". You fixed the problem by removing the
> garbage collection library libgc from your library of .sos. Correct?
Exactly. I removed the libgc library.
>
> I have seen other cases where the presence of a garbage collection
> library causes ngspice compilation to fail.
>
> If this is the case, all I need to do is get rid of checking for the
> GC library, or just force no garbage collector detection at configure
> time. I will try to do that for the final release (coming any day
> now. . .)
>
> > Will this be a problem with installation of TclSpice v0.2.17 - June 23,
> > 2004, which recommends installing the garbage collector?
>
> IIRC, the garbage collector is optional. Therefore, getting rid of it
> shouldn't cause a problem. The only problem might arise when you run
> tclspice for a long time on a large design, and it uses up all your
> memory during a calculation. You'll just have to see if this
> happens.
>
> Thanks again for the report!
>
> Stuart
>
>
--
David Hart <dhart155@xxxxxxxxxxx>