[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:31:03 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:31:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <44075586.3070807@bellsouth.net> (message from Marvin Dickens on Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:28:54 -0500)
References: <200603021746.28698.peter@peter-b.co.uk> <200603021755.k22Ht3ic011631@envy.delorie.com> <44075586.3070807@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

> Perhaps, this tip and the perl  script belong in the FAQ for gschem at 
> the wiki.

Symbol creation tools belong on gedasymbols.org ;-)

(yes, folks, we're making progress on that front)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
  - From: Ales Hvezda

References:
- gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
  - From: Peter Brett
- Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
  - From: Marvin Dickens

Prev by Author: gEDA-user: The PCB Postscript bug
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Dealing with really high-pin-count parts
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread