[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Symbol style recommendations
Real pinout doesnt work so well past 64 pins. But grouping by
function runs into the same problem, a huge square with nothing in the
middle and tons of pins coming off the edges. Maybe you could slot
big chips into io ports, a group of com pins, and a group of power
pins. Not sure how slotting can work with that kind of division.
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Peter TB Brett <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Peter TB Brett <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Symbol style recommendations
To: "gEDA user mailing list" <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 10:14 PM
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
On Thursday 19 March 2009 21:58:59 Josh Jordan wrote:
> I prefer to use actual pinouts in my schematics for two reasons: It
helps
> you with chip placement because naturally you will tend to place
symbols
> and lines to get the fewest line crossings. Going to layout after
you have
> already decided the best general position for parts makes it much
easier.
> The second reason is that later on it will be easy to look back to a
> schematic that has a similar layout as the board and the same
pinouts.
We'll have to agree to disagree. When I look at a schematic, I want to
be able
to quickly and easily work out what the circuit is designed to do, and
having
the pins on my symbols arranged by function and bus offset rather than
by
physical position helps a great deal.
What you're doing completely defeats the point of having separate
schematic
and layout diagrams, IMHO.
What do you do about parts that have different pinouts depending on
what
package they're in?
Peter
--
Peter Brett
Electronic Systems Engineer
Integral Informatics Ltd
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[1]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[2]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
References
1. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user