Re: gEDA-user: General Layers questions

[DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I do not agree with the term high level here.  I agree that there
> may be layers of different types, that require special treatment.
> These are low-level types, like "conductive" for layers that
> electrically connect things, or "holes" for connections between
> layers, and "other" for anything else.

We're talking about the same thing, but what you call "low level" I
call "high level", since I'm considering their place in the heirarchy
of categorization (conductor -> copper -> 1oz copper, or drawing ->
assembly -> courtyards), not the data structures they're implemented
with.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user