[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: fritzing-like gEDA? gEDA-like Fritzing?
Criminy... I have to admit, I couldn't even get the (1.5) source to
compile in Linux Kubuntu recently... so if people are saying it's easy
for those "not in the know" to work on gEDA source code, they're just
delusional. Of course, I am now going to try to use git and compile
that way since I was NEVER able to get the source on the release web
page to compile -- hoping those instructions are slightly clearer.
Kurt
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:16:49 -0600
> From: John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: fritzing-like gEDA? gEDA-like Fritzing?
> Fritzing-interface-to-gEDA?
> To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <F6CC23F5-6570-4AAB-86DE-229E620550B7@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On May 9, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
>
> > John Doty wrote:
> >>
> >> There are lots of GUI languages. But the critical thing is
defining
> >> the project. For that, there's only one candidate: "make".
There's
> >> nothing else that can deal with the declarations, rules, and
> >> procedures needed to put together a project using heterogeneous
> >> tools.
> >
> > Make was an excellent system in its day, but is now quite old and
> > clunky
> > in comparison to some of its more contemporary competitors.
>
> Make is ubiquitous and widely known. We should leverage that
> knowledge. The complexity of our project management problems in EDA
> is not so great, and make fits them well.
>
> > Scons, for
> > example, is a much better 'make' tool.
>
> Never heard of it. Never needed it to build anything. But a system
> without make is crippled.
>
> >
> > Chris
> > --
> > Chris Smith <cjs94@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user