[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
Colin D Bennett wrote:
> Not to get into the whole light/heavy symbol debate
Maybe, it is time to look at this issue again. When I first read geda
documentation, there were already references that this had been discussed
ad nauseam. As a result, the default lib was the way it was and is. This
is six year back now. Since then, this topic has not been raised on the
mailing list. But there are
Except for some bug fixes, the default lib stayed the same for all the
years. No symbols were added, none was removed, nothing was restructured.
If the default lib is to be changed now, then there should be some kind
of new consensus on the heavy/light issue. Else, the effort might end in
religious war and, or frustration.
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
UniversitÃt Hannover, Inst. fÃr Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211
Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user