On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 05:30:31PM -0500, Ales Hvezda wrote: > >Is it possible to generate a postscipt from gschem? The method I used to use > >doesn't work anymore - it generates a file, but it doesn't contain valid > >postscript. I tried to delete the error parts of the wanna-be PostScript that > > Yes, of course it is still possible to generate postscript > from gschem. I just tried it and as they say: "Works for me". > > Three questions: > > * Do you have the following file: > > $install_prefix/share/gEDA/prolog.ps > > installed? Yes. > > * How did you install gEDA/gaf? Did you install ALL the pieces and > are they all the same version? I just installed gschem and the libraries it was complaining about. That was libgeda and gschem. I already had a previous version of gschem installed. > > * More information would be useful, like a sample broken postscript > file. Reports without basic information are not that useful > and usually get a "Works for me" response. :) > > My initial guess is something is wrong with your installation. I only say > this because I'm assuming there would be more bug reports / screaming if > ps printing didn't work at all. OK attached. CL< > > -Ales > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Attachment:
rx_experimental_01.ps
Description: broken.ps
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user