[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: OpAmp with internally connected pins, need advice from experts



Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 16:16 -0400 schrieb John Luciani:

> > Should I really draw 4 visible output pins? (The THS4303 has not only
> > multiple power pins, but 4 identical output pins too) In the TI
> > datasheet only one output is drawn. 4 output pins really look strange.
> 
> I would. The information could be useful when probing the board.
> 
> (* jcl *)
> 

Yes, to see all physical pins in the schematic may have advantages.

But on the other hand: Some people may prefer abstract schematics.

Personally I would prefer to have one visible representation for each
group of connected pins (I like to see power pins, because output range
of an OpAmp is limited by its power supply.)

DJ Delorie wrote:

>Hmmm... I wonder if gschem could number a single pin "1,2,3,4" and
>have it do the right thing during netlisting?

Yes, something like this would be fine.

Best regards

Stefan Salewski




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user