[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Schematic Level DRC DIscussion

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:36:01 -0800, Dave N6NZ wrote:

> once upon I time I was pretty fluent with Prolog.  I still have a
> knee-jerk aversion to the language outside of toy problems.  

I should have placed a smiley...

Definition of rules shouldn't require knowledge of some kind of exotic 
computer language. That's why scheme scripts wouldn't do the trick for 
me. It is pure economy: How many schematics can I check manually while I 
am busy fighting with syntax problems?

While the rule language should be powerful, it must be easy to
grasp -- at least for the most common cases.

---<(kaimartin)>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
http://lilalaser.de/blog



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user