Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL Testers (please test)

[Frank Bergmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04.11.2010 02:50, Richard Barlow wrote:
> I've run the benchmark on the most complex board that I've currently
> designed in PCB.
...
> Design available at: git://srobo.org/boards/power-hw.git

I used that and have (benchmark performed 5 times and averages):

1. AMD Phenom 9550 Quad
   AMD Mobility Radeon HD3450 (driver: radeonhd)
   Debian Lenny

   PCB head: 10.9FPS
   PCB-20100929: 10.9FPS
   PCB before_pours  2.5FPS
   PCB local_customisation_no_pours (VBO): 3.2FPS
   PCB local_customisation_no_pours (array): 3.2FPS

2. AMD X2 BE-2400
   ATI RS690 [Radeon X1200 Series (chipset graphics)] (driver: radeon)
   Ubuntu 10.04.1

   PCB head: 12.3FPS
   PCB-20100929: 10.8FPS
   PCB before_pours  5.9FPS
   PCB local_customisation_no_pours (VBO): seg. fault
   PCB local_customisation_no_pours (array): seg. fault

3. Intel Core i3
   Intel Integrated Graphics Controller (i915)
   Ubuntu 10.04.1

   PCB head: 7.5FPS
   PCB-20100929: 8.2FPS
   PCB before_pours  14.5FPS
   PCB local_customisation_no_pours (VBO): 0.9FPS
   PCB local_customisation_no_pours (array): 18.1FPS

My both AMD/ATI card are not really high performance graphic cards and 
both running under open source drivers. The cards are not well supported 
by proprietary drivers at installation time.

Segmentation fault happens in hidgl_clean_unassigned_stencil() 
(hid/common/hidgl.c:1069) and backtrace goes into 
/usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so, so maybe its a problem in the driver.

Frank.



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user