[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL Testers (please test)
On local customisiations withthe robo board, with the polygon holes removed.
17" Macbook Pro
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro6,1
Processor Name: Intel Core i7
Processor Speed: 2.66 GHz
with GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M:
Chipset Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
Type: GPU
Bus: PCIe
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 512 MB
Vendor: NVIDIA (0x10de)
Device ID: 0x0a29
Revision ID: 0x00a2
ROM Revision: 3523
gMux Version: 1.9.22
Displays:
Color LCD:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Built-In: Yes
Averages 11.3 on 5 runs
built ontop of
local_customisations @ 15a9194337c90427cbfcf4c464d208896bdc3d05
With the space navigator code removed, as it is linux only.
Steve
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Frank Bergmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04.11.2010 02:50, Richard Barlow wrote:
>>
>> I've run the benchmark on the most complex board that I've currently
>> designed in PCB.
>>
> ...
>>
>> Design available at: git://srobo.org/boards/power-hw.git
>
> I used that and have (benchmark performed 5 times and averages):
>
> 1. AMD Phenom 9550 Quad
> AMD Mobility Radeon HD3450 (driver: radeonhd)
> Debian Lenny
>
> PCB head: 10.9FPS
> PCB-20100929: 10.9FPS
> PCB before_pours 2.5FPS
> PCB local_customisation_no_pours (VBO): 3.2FPS
> PCB local_customisation_no_pours (array): 3.2FPS
>
> 2. AMD X2 BE-2400
> ATI RS690 [Radeon X1200 Series (chipset graphics)] (driver: radeon)
> Ubuntu 10.04.1
>
> PCB head: 12.3FPS
> PCB-20100929: 10.8FPS
> PCB before_pours 5.9FPS
> PCB local_customisation_no_pours (VBO): seg. fault
> PCB local_customisation_no_pours (array): seg. fault
>
> 3. Intel Core i3
> Intel Integrated Graphics Controller (i915)
> Ubuntu 10.04.1
>
> PCB head: 7.5FPS
> PCB-20100929: 8.2FPS
> PCB before_pours 14.5FPS
> PCB local_customisation_no_pours (VBO): 0.9FPS
> PCB local_customisation_no_pours (array): 18.1FPS
>
> My both AMD/ATI card are not really high performance graphic cards and both
> running under open source drivers. The cards are not well supported by
> proprietary drivers at installation time.
>
> Segmentation fault happens in hidgl_clean_unassigned_stencil()
> (hid/common/hidgl.c:1069) and backtrace goes into /usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so,
> so maybe its a problem in the driver.
>
> Frank.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user