[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:24:21PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> True, but the xsvf file is much bigger than a simple serial bitstream,
> and the xsvf player is bigger than a raw spi dump...
A JTAG bit-banger is not hard to write (I've written at least two of
them), and a lot smaller than an xsvf file player. The one I use routinely
now takes a small fraction of the 8K program space of an 8051 derivative
(CY7C68013). The input file is the straight bitfile. Granted it will
run a little slower than SPI, because unless you're exceptionally lucky
it won't be hardware accelerated. It would be fun to take a crack at
the bit speed limit on that 96 MHz processor, though.
- Larry
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
- References:
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG (was Re: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks)
- Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
- Prev by Author:
gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG (was Re: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks)
- Next by Author:
Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
- Previous by thread:
Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
- Next by thread:
Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
- Index(es):