[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
DJ -
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > A JTAG bit-banger is not hard to write (I've written at least two of
> > them), and a lot smaller than an xsvf file player.
> Can you bit-bang a spartan 3 that way?
Yes. Shameless plug (and almost back OT, since the board was
laid out with pcb): http://recycle.lbl.gov/llrf4/
- Larry
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
- References:
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- Re: gEDA-user: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks
- gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG (was Re: icarus, fork, and recursive tasks)
- Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
- Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG
- Re: gEDA-user: FPGA, uC, and JTAG