Re: gEDA-user: GPLv3 question

["David C. Kerber" <dkerber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have never heard that you needed to supply the entire tool chain, just the source for the code that you run in your product.  I'm strictly a beginner at such things, though, so take what I say with a kilo or so of salt...
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Griessen
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 12:21 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: GPLv3 question
> 
> On 10/06/2010 10:30 AM, John Doty wrote:
> > You don't need to deliver *any* source code unless it is 
> requested by the user.
> 
> OK.  Let me rephrase that to,
> 
> "What would I need to make available to comply with GPLv3 for 
> a GPLv3 library delivered as part of an open hardware system?".
> 
> I'm wanting to clarify the difference between GCC used to 
> make the system's delivered code and
> libopenstm32 used to make the system's delivered code, where 
> parts of libopenstm32 are included in the output.  I'm 
> thinking I would need to make available libopenstm32 source, 
> but not GCC source.
> 
> Eh?
> 
> JG
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
> 


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user