[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Unresolved rat lines, zero-ohm resistor, wire bridge

Hi,
no, it really does not work. I think you are suggesting #2. The autorouter is unpredictable. If I change anything in the schematics, the autorouter comes with different design, often worse than before with more unresolved rat lines. Adding a jumper in schematics does not result into reducing rat lines.
One example: I had six unresolved rat lines. I added six "resistors" into appropriate places in schematics. And, voila, I ended up with _nine_ unresolved rat lines and almost no traces went underneath the resistors. The autorouter did not find the solution. 

Jan Martinek

On 10/16/2010 06:53 PM, Rick Collins wrote:

I'm not sure I understand the problem with #1.  Can't you take the
mostly routed design and back annotate the jumpers so that they are
parts in the original schematic? Then you get what you are looking for
in #3 which you think is the best approach.

Rick

At 12:17 PM 10/16/2010, you wrote:

Hello,

I am trying to design a single-sided board with SMD components only
(no drilling). The toporouter (which is absolutely awesome, btw.)
routes almost all rat lines with only several left unresolved. But,
what now? I can do several things:

1) Make the PCB and connect suitable places with wire.
disadvantage: The PCB cannot be published without further explanation.
And, it is not beautiful.

2) Insert dummy components like zero-ohm resistors or jumper wire in
schematics with the hope, that some traces can be routed below the
components.
disadvantage: The schematics looks crazy. Moreover, surprisingly, it
does not help. The autorouter "sees" different circuit and magically
designs different traces. Often, number of unresolved rat lines
increases. And, it is totally unpredictable where exactly to insert
the "dummy" components and how many of them.

3) Make "double sided" PCB and the other side realize with wire
bridges only.
Disadvantage: This is a bad idea as number of vias is much higher that
number of unresolved rat lines.

4) Use #1 but do some manual post-processing.
disadvantage: At any change in the schematics the manual work must be
done again.

The best solution (for me) would be #3 if:
- the number of vias would be as small as possible
- vias should be in pairs so that the wire connects exactly two.

Or this:
- if some rat lines cannot be solved, make a pair of pads (or pins)
for them.

Does anyone have an idea?

Thank you very much,
Jan Martinek


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user