Re: gEDA-user: Newbie wondering about simulation

[Wojciech Kazubski <wk0@xxxxx>]

> On Sunday 24 October 2010, Hannu Vuolasaho wrote:
> > Changing manually to X1 makes the simulation work but it
> > isn't really the Solution.
> 
> Yes, it is the solution, for now.  Ultimately, the solution is
> to move away from Spice format netlists.
> 
> In Spice, the device type is determined by the first letter.
> The letter "M" says to use a built-in MOSFET model.  The name
> (after the nodes) refers to a ".model" "card".  (When using a
> spice netlist, it is common to refer to the lines in a netlist
> as "cards")  The letter "M" does not ever refer to a "subckt".
> If something is defined as a subckt, the first letter of the
> label must be "X".
> 
It would be nice to have a special atribute "spicetype" or so to force the 
spice to use the proper model. Long time ago I proposed this, but it was not 
implemented in spice-sdb backend.

Wojciech Kazubski


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user