Re: gEDA-user: Introduction and some questions/thoughts on gEDA/gaf...

[John Luciani <jluciani@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have been naming my directories in the form ---

 <component group>-<component subgroup>

A few examples ---

  connector-header/
  connector-power/
  connector-misc/

  ic-Linear-Technology/
  ic-Maxim/
  ic-misc/

  passive-resistor/
  passive-capacitor/
  passive-inductor/

  semi-BJT/
  semi-FET/
  semi-diode/

  symbol-power/
  
(* jcl *)


On 9/11/05, Ales Hvezda <ahvezda@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [snip]
> >*  Note that I have *not* attempted to clean up the symbol directories,
> >nor have I created a new spice-device directory.  I figure we should
> >have a larger discussion with Ales and everybody else if we decide to
> >do this.  In any event, we can limp along with what we have right now
> >quite well.
> 
>         I have been neglecting the symbol library, so the next major
> version of gEDA/gaf will be a symbol cleanup/reorg release.  I'm all ears
> to what issues people have with the existing symbol organization/layout.
> 
>         Few things that have come up recently:
> 
> 1) The analog/ directory should probably be split or renamed up into
>    something more reasonable.  I'm open for suggestions.  The name
>    "passives" was suggested a while ago.
> 
> 2) Yes, I'm all for creating a new spice directory, or making sure that
>    all the symbols in the spice directory work.
> 
> 3) I want to go through and make sure that all vendor specific symbols are
>    in vendor specific directories.  I remember a few complaints about this.
> 
> Others?
> 
> -Ales
> 
>