[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Serious discussion on the proper selection of a language

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Serious discussion on the proper selection of a language
From: Xtian Xultz <xultz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:20:57 -0300
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:20:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <b36424cab181c61cc471c58b588b5acd@neurotica.com>
Organization: AXC Inc.
References: <433873F2.7020801@cyconix.com> <1127863991.8042.34.camel@linux.site> <b36424cab181c61cc471c58b588b5acd@neurotica.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

Em Ter 27 Set 2005 20:38, Dave McGuire escreveu:
> On Sep 27, 2005, at 7:33 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
> > Since, for little good reason, my proposal to require a rewrite of geda
> > in snoboll on cpm was regected I would like to put forth a new
> > proposal.
> > The language INTERCAL http://www.catb.org/~esr/intercal/
>
>    No!  It must be rewritten in Befunge, the one true language!
>
What about Brainfuck?
http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Serious discussion on the proper selection of a language
  - From: Stephen Meier

References:
- gEDA-user: VeriWell now on SourceForge
  - From: Evan Lavelle
- Re: gEDA-user: Serious discussion on the proper selection of a language
  - From: Steve Meier
- Re: gEDA-user: Serious discussion on the proper selection of a language
  - From: Dave McGuire

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: It's alive!
Next by Author: gEDA-user: unsubscribe
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Serious discussion on the proper selection of a language
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Serious discussion on the proper selection of a language
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread