The only other way I can think of (that doesn't introduce dependencies) involves a collection of Batch files, none of which are particularly nice....
Given that .NET gets installed as a Windows Update..... I figured it was probably safe. Especially given since the app only requires version 2.0, which is supported on 98SE.
The problem is dealing with the "portable" root that way. Couldn't find an obvious way to get the directory of the *current* file. Not the working directory, the directory of the current file. Windows has the joys of shortcuts having a tendancy to start in C:\Windows..... or somewhere other than the "Start In:" field.
Anyway, I'd say this enough of the "Why .NET?" argument. What've I broken in building it this way? Do let me know.
Cheers, Chris On 19/09/2010 18:44, John Griessen wrote:
On 09/19/2010 12:12 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:Anyone USING .net in 2010 is asking to be ridiculed.Are there other ways than .NET to "help out" a build on windows? (I don't see messages from timecop, since he's in my kill file) What's the status of Carlos Nieve's build method? John _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user