[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: gschem sym files
Karl Hammar wrote:
> Shall we update the distributed sym files so they pass gsymcheck ?
Yes, please.
I gave up on gsymcheck because it caused more work due to false alarms
than it saved by pointing to real errors.
> Should a missing numslots=0 really be a warning?
> It is annoying to include it in most sym files just to make gsymcheck
> to shut up.
ack. It has been quite some time that numslots=0 is not necessary
anymore.
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user