Nick Mathewson writes: > If we need to patch Privoxy, we need to patch Privoxy. If at all > possible, we should of course push patches back towards the mainline > Privoxy, but if we are forced to choose between "Tor won't work" and > "we ship a patched Privoxy", then we ship a patched Privoxy. > > [...] > > I don't want it in Tor proper either, but I still think it'd be a > better deal to ship an omnibus, "batteries-included" package. Whole-hearted agreement! :) Also, I will try your Mac build later on this week when I get chance, Nick. Thanks! -- Chris Palmer Technology Manager, Electronic Frontier Foundation 415 436 9333 x124 (desk), 415 305 5842 (cell) 81C0 E11D CE73 4390 B6C7 3415 B286 CD8F 68E4 09CD
Attachment:
pgpkmegjmnDWy.pgp
Description: PGP signature