[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which proxy to use?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Which proxy to use?
- From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:03:14 -0700
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:03:19 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9f1A58C3gWEGmtAJD/Md9hQYge5rXgBiTSnWTOryCBQ=; b=BlQcQYXdaD68nRzuU4BqpNVAm8U8t2fpAy7VF7HnPVs6SAn6XTZgiImZrLAKAAFYQh wEqgX0wMjxgjd2zyWQWFgV+jnNg62cv17Q9wkLhHiLVGrKCnYVz+IOGqKBNM3OO9S/DF FyEGQowDCA2kbdNhxRF6yA1E2AYXPQfvdIZ5U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CYJGcNZDAqON1T9X+5yonFu0BtKhJ/f0ZYREw3fLtKwZsOy8cjpPt/X9MJex/UjdqO no72TT4JFheDKYoViq1DnzOJ2KBD5ptHnrbToIwxtsZ+yeJ/12iERD8XJEPFv5y9DC9M xK1iowD4tDqiHBO7XCufIWt6ZNI04kRiyaitE=
- In-reply-to: <734605.69102.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <734605.69102.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Mr. Blue<trashdsfg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My requirements are:
>
> 1) It must have privoxy's functionality: hide-tor-exit-notation header filter to remove the Tor exit node notation in Host and Referer headers.
exit notation as used this way is a deprecated feature. it will be
removed at some point. you really want the controller to direct an
exit for you, if you need it, rather than some mangled domain names
implying the choice.
> 2) Must be capable to run as a reverse proxy.
> ...
what are you trying to do, exactly?
best regards,