[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Testing bridge capabilities

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Testing bridge capabilities
From: Drake Wilson <drake@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:23:35 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:23:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <47787BA5.80206@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <47730FEE.8040000@xxxxxxxxxx> <47760DF7.7020708@xxxxxxxxx> <47787BA5.80206@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Quoth Andrew Del Vecchio <firefox-gen@xxxxxxxxxx>, on 2007-12-30 21:18:29 -0800:
> GRC says port is closed but not stealthed. Firestarter shows that I have
> a remote connection via tor on port 433, and TCP433 is allowed. What
> could still be going wrong here?

Okay, you know what?

_443_ or _433_?  Which is in your Tor config?  Which are you testing?
Is it even consistent?

If you're getting them confused, that sounds like the first thing to
fix!

   ---> Drake Wilson

References:
- Testing bridge capabilities
  - From: Andrew Del Vecchio
- Re: Testing bridge capabilities
  - From: F. Fox
- Re: Testing bridge capabilities
  - From: Andrew Del Vecchio

Prev by Author: Re: IRC privacy with Tor
Next by Author: Help with directory mirror
Previous by thread: Re: Testing bridge capabilities
Next by thread: Tor 0.2.0.15-alpha is out
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread