[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:52:07 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:53:05 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ETyTECUJCqQl0+LsXYjjRTJkKV+wKTjyRoSlZ7xg484=; b=I+xZYS0d2tTncdTJ6CApOeFdOf/uVvlYZMjWTqFmMsInfRPLOBmQZ1NjG8WDfUatX9 Oe89WSn2/gvwAZNm3oC4Zn6TqLdFaAtAglNo1XaGi+SsYMDR7pcU3bBxbfegrnAQu7Kv I7GAzucLB8eQQWZ3v3fa3rHXVpbiXF9wpbnxlUND189twh05XQOueDqK3Fr4NIXA/cI9 Kf3wKkGQ1jI846tYpX/T2AjIqgbOAIV/ID+HCX4M4/zd+/upvYckVHj6iwvuktFwNAh4 hj2bfDBMTh9ed8V0gFZzmCyE3BZ+Th+xTlQKconQiv1flRIv6esuUcgm4KrYUjvRULXY d+XQ==
In-reply-to: <CAFWeb9Ju4MM+iHnTFBomZ70RH06KsaUw5TWMwGu3CygCTQFkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <N1M-6aQAsj09wf@Safe-mail.net> <5a22da0b-5fdc-3181-0926-c4b85ac05190@cannon-ciota.info> <CAFWeb9+pcw7g63LbkrcD8YRaDdqpPx5vEcBSguHAcyjt_QT_tg@mail.gmail.com> <CAB7TAMn-aM=HwOFcGvMp5fSK2C0urd699+CdqCgEOX1L4JpXFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWeb9Jn9F9mMENR1qeur3LFYq9tfqWrg=Wdh2r0EUkpD-vgvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJKNzo0w=6iBH58VC0t8GAD4wYObAWQJxxaJeAjMS76SSOwECw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWeb9KxcXEPFkDkZWMm3O_wwqT_rEN4PGgXAqQjRHzBvh6FXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJKNzo2UuQNrNGbYs8p09cEaFwYhpe+e7mqa447OCe5jA83=zQ@mail.gmail.com> <30060119-3bea-22e7-9624-52d63edaf884@riseup.net> <CAFWeb9Ju4MM+iHnTFBomZ70RH06KsaUw5TWMwGu3CygCTQFkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The default is off so there's no problem as I see it.
Resonating SJL and others on this re onionland opsec we've
observed since day one.
And if someone gains write access to your torrc, you're done anyways
(btw, torrc should also be possible to compile in static).
I would not make it a controller option, but would show
its status in controller.
And I wouldn't set downstream or embedded stuff
like GlobalLeaks to ship with it on by default.
A separate branch for this is dumb... if you really care
./configure --(enable|disable)-single-hop-onions .
Users of downloaded tor binaries have far bigger learning curve,
models, and risks to hurdle over before this ever matters.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Mirimir

References:
- [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: hikki
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Cannon
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Alec Muffett
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Allen
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Alec Muffett
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: laurelai bailey
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Alec Muffett
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: laurelai bailey
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Mirimir
- Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
  - From: Alec Muffett

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
Next by Author: [tor-talk] Intel ME / AMT + NSL vs Tor Nodes
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Not comfortable with the new single-hop system merged into Tor
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread