[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: Tor hogging cpu

Finally got a few minutes to sit down and check out the activity.  Here's a link
to a screenshot of top:
http://linux-2.lan.nihilist.ca/~michael/images/computer/nirvana-cpu-use.html  If
the server is slow, please forgive me, I'm hosting it locally while I try to
figure out what to do about the fact that people have been smashing into my
regular hosting server. 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Michael Laccetti [c]
Sent: February 18, 2005 09:45
To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Tor hogging cpu [signed]

I compiled mine with -march=pentium4 -Os -pipe

Could be how busy the server is.  My Tor server runs at 500k+ pretty solidly. 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Martin Balvers
Sent: February 18, 2005 01:09
To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor hogging cpu [u]

I am running Tor on 2 Gentoo machines, without any problems. The busier box uses
more resources, but it's not causing problems (it runs on a slow dual celeron
366 mhz with only 128MB ram).
Could it have something to do with the used compiler optimizations ?
I use CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -Os -pipe -funroll-loops -fforce-addr

Michael Laccetti wrote:
> I've had the same problem, though since I just restarted Tor (did some 
> software upgrades/cleaning on the server) it's currently not running 
> too badly.  But give it a day, and it'll eat the CPU for 100% most of 
> the time.  In fact, I had to turn it off to do the compilation of the 
> new packages.  Was just chewing the processor otherwise.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of SK
> Sent: February 17, 2005 04:35
> To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Tor hogging cpu [u]
> I have had several problems with Tor before the version, but 
> no problem with so far. Don't have a Gentoo machine to compare 
> with yours, I use
> FC3 on an AMD 64 Athlon.
> Could it be something specific to Gentoo or your env.?
> SK
>>On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:16:45PM +0000, Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro
> Felisberto wrote:
>>>I'm running on linux x86 (2.6.10 kernel with grsec and nptl
>>>glibc) and have been running the server for a few days and now:
>>>I'm going to stop the process and restart it.
>>>There is nothing in the logs that acuses some kind of problem.

GPG key ID: 0xB72BEC80

---------------------[ Ciphire Signature ]----------------------
From: michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx signed email body (2191 characters)
Date: on 19 February 2005 at 06:17:43 UTC
To:   or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
: Ciphire has secured this email against identity theft.
: Free download at www.ciphire.com. The garbled lines
: below are the sender's verifiable digital signature.
------------------[ End Ciphire Signed Message ]----------------