On 21/02/12 22:33, Mr Dash Four wrote: >> Because you wont be taken seriously by anyone otherwise. >> > Eh?! Why do you think I care what you, or anybody, thinks? You and your > "low-key" friend are an irrelevance - I know what I saw when I accessed > those two sites earlier today and nothing will compel me to access them > ever again, or use them as my search engine tool of choice, no matter > how hard you may try to convince me otherwise! The only thing that my low-key friends and I have been trying to do is discover the cause of a problem you reported. I am genuinely interested in seeing what caused it, to see if it can be fixed. I myself have only just started using that search engine because Scroogle has gone offline. >> I just went to torproject.org and it told me to disable Tor so they >> could log my IP address and send it to the feds. Nobody "sane" would use >> torproject.org anymore. I'm going to provide no evidence for this. >> >> When you see how seriously you take the above claim, you'll see how >> seriously I take yours. >> > There is a small flaw in the above, however - the Tor Project is a > well-known entity with a rich history of protecting personal privacy and > security (a project I have made contributions to myself, I might add). > The absolute no-mark search-engine sites you are trying to push really > hard in this thread, however, are not - not even close! Only an imbecile > with no more than two brain cells would compare them two. I notice you had difficulty identifying the point I was trying to make in my analogy. I wont confuse you with any more of them. -- Mike Cardwell https://grepular.com/ http://cardwellit.com/ OpenPGP Key 35BC AF1D 3AA2 1F84 3DC3 B0CF 70A5 F512 0018 461F XMPP OTR Key 8924 B06A 7917 AAF3 DBB1 BF1B 295C 3C78 3EF1 46B4
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk