[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
From: Maxim Kammerer <mk@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:53:05 +0200
Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mk@xxxxxx designates 10.182.169.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mk@xxxxxx; dkim=pass header.i=mk@xxxxxx
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:53:41 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dee.su; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pz6HwR8tpb6Q5N22vebAiMjP8QfYUbbHUvqwRBlcTv4=; b=iORNLA3b56L1pbNvexR9iT1YsQE5t+zo2kvBpOl6+35zTt8G9mX1VsP3TxqludA7U0 cJ34nyv3MbqKuNLY1ILyrYWxC8ggBOptT+sLuR0PBpFZ2PS1jAjGXQD0Nc5Rnd2HlSp0 iAfdZtwvPVRwDwQ+z6vkCexvvXSR3YIFzvemg=
In-reply-to: <4F441F87.7090008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing." <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1329853493.11824.YahooMailClassic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F43F552.7020903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F440311.3080104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4413BF.4070308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F44155D.9010806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F441BAA.40504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F441F87.7090008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 00:49,  <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am genuinely interested in seeing what caused it, to see if it can be fixed.

Searching for the message, the following discussion turns up,
suggesting that a blank UA was the culprit once:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26912429
Perhaps it's something similar this time. I guess that Ixquick could
add a disclaimer about why privacy-oriented extensions may break the
site — for the benefit of users who lack the capability of
self-criticism. If anyone feels inclined:
https://ixquick.com/eng/feedback.html#contact

-- 
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute)
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
  - From: Low-Key²
- Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
  - From: Mr Dash Four
- Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
  - From: tor
- Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
  - From: Mr Dash Four
- Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
  - From: tor
- Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
  - From: Mr Dash Four
- Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
  - From: tor

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] secure and simple network time (hack)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Cannot finish handshake with directory server (Kazakhstan)
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Scroogle is No More?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread