Re: [tor-talk] new paper on Tor and cryptography

["l.m" <ter.one.leeboi@xxxxxxxx>]

Nick Mathewson wrote:
>  Personally, if I were doing something like this, I'd aim closer to
>  Yawning's "Basket" protocol, which uses an established PQ
construction
>  (ntru in Basket's case) rather than trying to invent a novel one.

While you're asking  --
Isn't that like saying who needs SHA-3 because SHA-2 hasn't been
proven
broken? Why not just use MD-contruct? It uses the same argument, yes,
no?
Has the future of PQ computing become so well established?

Thanks taxakis

-- leeroy

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk