On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:34:16PM +0100, Steve Crook wrote: > Can you expand on why you think using anonymous remailers will fail to > deliver messages? Judging by the current stats the Mixmaster Remailer > network appears highly reliable. The network itself is reliable, but due to spam abuse the recipient will likely reject at attempted delivery, or the message will be misclassified as spam. > The major limitation of Mixmaster remailers are that they only provide > anonymous, not pseudonymous (two way) communication. If users can > live with this constraint then remailers offer the best solution for > anonymous email and Usenet posting. Usenet maybe, but if you expect your message to be delivered reliably, you have to go through authenticated channels. Abusers are ruining it for everybody. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature