[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] EFF Tor Challenge

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:36 -0700, CACook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wednesday 1 June, 2011 18:41:47 Marsh Ray wrote:
> > > - VirtualBox VM bridged to LAN still must share the LAN class C, and
> > > could potentially monitor internal traffic.   (And please don't
> > > quibble with me calling it a class C... they have to make up a name
> > > and stick with it.  I still call Nissan's a Datsun)
> > 
> > No, you're factually wrong on the deeper point. The muddy terminology is 
> > just a symptom.
> Yeah that's a big help.  I can take that to the bank!
> Look, I'm a real estate developer, not a coder.  OK?  
> When I have something I can work with I'll consider a relay, but as long
> as everyone is coy about security, you will have trouble recruiting
> relays.  That's a fact, deal with it.

They had no trouble recruiting me and I don't even know what a
'VirtualBox brideged to a LAN' is. Lots of people trust Tor to work and
be secure. No coyness required.

http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...

tor-talk mailing list