[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
From: Allen <allenpmd@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:39:32 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 11:39:51 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=9fxsh3jsVA57CuIG8iEp6P3zjGzcRQLGVuMXPXgDang=; b=o7/qzp/z9z9pK7ZmDn85zEgFkfld/Wc3BIWlRljYC98vUH6v11rBt1PbuseuUFtknk V2N5REdzQk+TTTU5g4kmaBfIKsVo9hjKUnzie8EIOsq0zIKjEh6b7+KJ2Q4qi+WaPmKK 2rLKMsbgbXmuclzesDDH2i3Af+icM2bObroeuHdHdOLp1E+nfOZNQyGFT0xud1qtBdzL xt1xP/KYOBiIzbfyB5bMLw7qnijA7qwyClyU7bFjTaLNfdvHh/X+im6BhFwb5Nk7VgyC qHz7wbz0blFTcwwA7VaiRijUUW/KjwHLMiwSyqfq7AWqqCOvjGV8MKwQzeM8ReRuAMMs 8Xxg==
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti29CZAhtG0YTjnPx=RQ+hPkJAsCgTGd=Sd3U0W_r4uRVag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAD2Ti28Qt9YKC69AfSMKAPQ8sDqxnHHpv6wD6Zi8pSeW3cMfaQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <574FF7BF.1020604@xxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti29CZAhtG0YTjnPx=RQ+hPkJAsCgTGd=Sd3U0W_r4uRVag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> There's nothing you can do about it but
> - start researching and using networks that use fill traffic
>

Another alternative would be to re-architect the services of interest to
use a message or packet store-and-forward protocol with a random delay to
thwart traffic analysis.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: Flipchan
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: grarpamp

References:
- [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: juanjo
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: grarpamp

Prev by Author: [tor-talk] State of IPv6 in Tor
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread