[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
From: Allen <allenpmd@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:45:45 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:46:00 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ERxzmqz/tTlx8eUdCuekzie/03OCNtAZOvjx4pQEAt8=; b=VXNdldZ+tYt399VYkmNYADzd4Znh2alIUWCKzPR3Oo9LcJqtNwG7R4S1etq7O0uw5l g9rjJz5pLa8yg1+pKc+/PlT44ZToWN9nDP+xbVROLLg/XIepHzb5FR7CIfHiRBB6vTli gBmkPopF9nhzJOWAy0bxRTPar7XMZbA6Owogt0+F3L6SPX/vijrOBsWbmnR/EbXB1oM5 8N2rsUARUpy/1vohM9LayH6Qhoajcu0fcdoKKayWLi0mHa6y8epRaaGWGJn3B9uSj10Z 2PJZWkvxhOknOZ6r0GEFsLVchyQypF1CQYLScRif8pq50dMa4kpR39RT0o7Ez2+JfxY0 xHIg==
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti280dofTBwGO+y2s2-UP2deEznhrF5E996nLXbwepRvtQQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAD2Ti28Qt9YKC69AfSMKAPQ8sDqxnHHpv6wD6Zi8pSeW3cMfaQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <574FF7BF.1020604@xxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti29CZAhtG0YTjnPx=RQ+hPkJAsCgTGd=Sd3U0W_r4uRVag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAB7TAMnyTXqqrxyV4Fixu4Ndm=KVqasSSkuvSChTk78X=D5NZw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti280dofTBwGO+y2s2-UP2deEznhrF5E996nLXbwepRvtQQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Fixed packet sizes seem to help.
>

another alternative would be random packet sizes, ie, the packet size
transmitted to the next hop would not be the same as the size received
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: grarpamp

References:
- [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: juanjo
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: Allen
- Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
  - From: grarpamp

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] A possible solution to traffic correlation attacks,
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread