The thing that bothered me was that I pointed you to a paper and two FAQs, and rather than reading those FAQs and the relevant parts of that paper, you instead answered based on what you thought the paper probably said, and asked questions that were discussed in those FAQs.
Nevertheless, my response was not in tune with the level of discourse we should promote on this list; I'll try to do better in the future.
ah, no sarcasm tagging, now I really don't know what to think ;)
poncenby