[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
From: Maxim Kammerer <mk@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 14:16:23 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 08:16:54 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dee.su; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NtFJtgCUxNychW4c9TE6xoK5JhdzE0CcHv9Z1Sc5Q2o=; b=RvyrdrTrhVy/6NS3weO7+dQdSDTWm+YLwiPyasW8V0k17hC4/2XhQyvNhklvXOrIch DCPzZnlWU9rX9wwOhpcOYxXiZl0fIqMaJ+39TooKTckCHFO69kuW2jBjQCg6R3w19CWm fswlhskzKc26619tAgFvz6N4oqQOEcJN7V4Fk=
In-reply-to: <5094FD31.6070800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5093FCAE.3080904@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAKDKvuzq20oV2YFLfQMA1TR0VXuU=KMCX23K1-iPRwm12fcK5A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50940416.6000409@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAKDKvuzSjACr2KkBct44V-Dw_bttJLZLL2Ev6xZ3Y4xTH3bH=g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50945905.9020807@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50948B3D.6000400@xxxxxxxxx> <857gq3xexi.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <5094FD31.6070800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can you give me a list of things that matter most to you in order of
> your priority? The bug list is mighty long...

inb4 incoming stream of Debian-centric patches: please be wary of
glibc differences:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395953

Wrt. this specific bug, perhaps you will want to use Anthony Basile's
solution instead of the patch in Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636943

-- 
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: intrigeri

References:
- [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: adrelanos
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: adrelanos
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: Matthew Finkel
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: intrigeri
- Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
  - From: Jacob Appelbaum

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Unsigned Mac OS X binary for TorBrowser
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Can I trust Tormail
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] torsocks is broken and unmaintained
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread