Re: First results of analysis

[Claude LaFrenière <climenole@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi  *coderman*   :


> some kind of automated testing for rogue exits would be useful though.

May be but read this thread first to have a the complete story:

From: "Alexander W. Janssen" 
Newsgroups: gmane.network.tor.user
Subject: Analyzing TOR-exitnodes for anomalies
Message-ID: <20061004163314.GB23881@xxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:56:03 +0000 (UTC)

The *facts* collected until now shows that the problems seems to comes from
web site hosting with some "services" for their "valuable customers" like
"filtering" and adding some redirections and frames for advertisement...

Look at this post about some "tests" with so-called rogue exits nodes:

From: Claude LaFrenière
Newsgroups: gmane.network.tor.user
Subject: Re: Analyzing TOR-exitnodes for anomalies
Message-ID: <rknwz71qez8h.xowlj2nmtp3q$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:51:13 +0000 (UTC)

Based on the data collected until now, 
the problem do not comes from the exit nodes
but from some web site hosting services...

:)

-- 
Claude LaFrenière