[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spam over Tor

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Spam over Tor
From: Mike Cardwell <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:09:27 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:09:36 -0400
In-reply-to: <20071026083101.GA16318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20071025071334.GA25831@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071025115919.GT5175@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47209C76.8000807@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20071026083101.GA16318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sp4mtr4p: D0 N0T EM4IL <sp4m-tr4p-d0-n0t-em4il@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Lexi Pimenidis wrote:

I don't see how this is any different than the "pwned" calls


We also don't see any technical chance to stop this. However we just
wanted to announce that at least the statement that there is no spam
over Tor is history...

If I write a web based application that sends out loads of spam if youclick a button, then connect to the Tor network and click that button.Does that classify as spam over Tor?


Mike

References:
- Spam over Tor
  - From: Lexi Pimenidis
- Re: Spam over Tor
  - From: Dave Page
- Re: Spam over Tor
  - From: Michael Holstein
- Re: Spam over Tor
  - From: Lexi Pimenidis

Prev by Author: Re: Spam over Tor
Next by Author: Leopard Vidalia
Previous by thread: Re: Spam over Tor
Next by thread: Re: Spam over Tor
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread