[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Full bandwidth is not used.
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Full bandwidth is not used.
- From: "Thomas S. Benjamin" <tomb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:31:04 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:31:13 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZPcEY33WqHTXLU0x1cWC+F0UINOwrEaHgJRgV/yvhos=; b=MH3bMusLDoWQfKEXk4BEKE4rNnvXqYEzldIlp47EBbsaOFf28qyUw4CdLyTIIChhgX wy7VnZGUMLQJqmnsev0MCPvoRUodfG3FzH1vPcppM4tIv1FtTg0WS43dZk2S8vw7bXy0 KXo5FpjSkI+RWDTlNkMhPHiz9ZqK2D88tJXnI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=n2ZEcWbP9OES4mCGsZz/Ag9YL0AWM0RKlz/evFvSxd1hPCjpbLxr+qqKukwEWXeqED +NNTT09BK/hwFFezrMD2Pis3vdwhTFLnYqKqPvxyZpWr9nZVzxc1Ir0nMzwmANiZweh4 gopQKjPW3Qm2QZmPXcbSDL1PqHtwN1I3D5R1s=
- In-reply-to: <1286974062.3904.34.camel@mattotaupa>
- References: <1286974062.3904.34.camel@mattotaupa>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul,
Is your relay running on a virtual machine (V-colo)?
If so, check your user beancounters, they may show you which resources
are being exhausted. Also, do you find any messages in your log?
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Paul Menzel
<paulepanter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Tor folks,
>
>
> I am still seeing the same problem [1]. In April it used the whole limit
> of 1 TB and hibernated after the limit was reached, but afterward it
> only came back to around 100 GB per month.
>
> Fast IT is not limiting the bandwidth in any way. I tested that. CPU and
> memory are not utilized completely either.
>
> Here is the output from arm.
>
> arm - anonymisierungsdienst (Linux...) Tor 0.2.1.26 (recommended)
> anonymisierungsdien - 0.0.0.0:9090, Dir Port: 80, Control Port (open): 9051
> cpu: 0.5% mem: 92 MB (13.0%) pid: 1186 uptime: 14-15:11:11
> fingerprint: B3EC1BF5D7F7D724BA634D91BE5D22D2D7A70160
> flags: Exit, Fast, Guard, Named, Running, Stable, Valid
>
> I only have
>
> AccountingMax 500 GB
>
> set in `/etc/tor/torrc`.
>
> So it must be a Tor problem. As you can see from the graphs the
> bandwidth usage goes up and down quite often. What might be the reason?
> Besides it is still below the available 100 Mbit/s.
>
> So does rebalancing still have problems as indicated in Andrew’s answer
> [3]?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
> [1] http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Mar-2010/msg00010.html
> [2] http://www.atagar.com/arm/
> [3] http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Apr-2010/msg00140.html
>
--
Sincerely Yours,
---Thomas S. Benjamin
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/