John Pinkman wrote:
What about facebook, or gmail, or yahoo selling your information to advertisers? These women also send them to multiple random parties, this also makes them not private. What is private anyway? Stupidity just isn't compatible with privacy much.
So because other people do bad things, that makes the bad things okay to do? That's rather ridiculous, don't you think? As for "what is private anyway" that's pretty straightforward in this case. If one sends a picture to a lover, the expectation is that it will be kept private. Shaming women for normal expressions of sexuality is fucking bullshit.
And people you might deem as "stupid" deserve privacy just as much as the rest of us.
~Griffin -- "I believe that usability is a security concern; systems that do not pay close attention to the human interaction factors involved risk failing to provide security by failing to attract users." ~Len Sassaman -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk