Re: Re: [pygame] PyGameDB coming along well

["Richie Ward" <richies@xxxxxxxxx>]

I plan to add the option in the server to upload a py2exe version that
you can download while browsing the website (so you can run the game
standalone)
I think hypernuke can be used as a file hosting service for pygame.org
also, both projects are working together as this project will
re-package games from pygame.org and perhaps get some that are
designed exclusively for hypernuke :)

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Patrick Mullen <saluk64007@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hypernucleus has too many syllables in my opinion.  But if it's too
> late, that's OK I guess.  I would go with a shorter "hyperNuke".  Less
> of a spelling problem as well.  But if it's already hypernucleus,
> that's fine :)
>
> I also think it would be cool if it could use pypi or even pygame.org
> as a backend.  Maybe not at first, but more backends would mean that
> people don't have to worry about submitting to hypernuke, or
> resubmitting if their game already exists somewhere else.  The problem
> with pygame.org is that the fetch mechanism is pretty loose - some
> people put a source, some put exe, some just link to their website
> where you have to find a download.  So that would need to be sorted
> out.  At this point though, I do like browsing the games at pygame.org
> a lot.  But having one click to download and play would be a big added
> benefit.
>



-- 
Thanks, Richie Ward