[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?

To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
From: "Charlie Nolan" <funnyman3595@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:13:32 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:13:36 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JcHWqPSwjsclyB4MfXQCF5+c28ghtVQpiMlmCvV2CkM=; b=iKbXQv7K5GHbLkfVbc7FWr5/CuUNh4xW2jsZhiAhkvCcYBdptQO1JpIkUVS6kFU/jg zuup2aOYxcoG+V0KnOP5Zo2BTViCN1M6KjFOTueG9f0dqE6exOU3slzdp9LMAJ9ppd+N hJ52lHF3qxhoSZ3JU/M5VKHK/le8bU+aNJczI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Tlxv5cSumQnc46P0oVnnSEBwkrAxaDLsC1Zoe0lduImfPKvT4rExIeGGIQgNecJLhq ZHAUF9h3gdrZIYJyE8gGI9GM/0gw6KoDm0TI6po4XZwLzjY8kih5qqdVbcH130yQFgKE 4GizKeVU+xAOrodcleylyQal2Ei6+7XzfLlww=
In-reply-to: <92599557-000F-472D-9F39-28A9EEA03DC8@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49402C18.80105@xxxxxxxxx> <DB87F9F6-971F-4E1D-9E42-7FB8E7CE75EF@xxxxxxxxxx> <49405BE5.2040601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <92599557-000F-472D-9F39-28A9EEA03DC8@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx

Actually, I'm pretty sure that I've got Python 2.5 installed on a OS X
10.2 machine.  I remember that it was officially one OS X version
earlier than was supported, but it installed and runs just fine.  I've
been building py2app+Pygame stuff on it.

-FM

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Joe Strout <joe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
>
>>>> Do we still need to keep Pygame Python 2.3 compatible. I believe Python
>>>> 2.3 shipped with Mac OS X Tiger. Is it still the OS X default?
>>>
>>> No, OS X (10.5) comes with 2.5.1.
>>
>> Some people still use 10.4, though!
>
> True.  And that came with Python 2.3.5.
>
> But, is anyone still using 10.4 who's a pygame *developer*?  End-user apps
> could be bundled (with py2app), and then it shouldn't matter which version
> of python the user has installed (at least AIUI).
>
> Best,
> - Joe
>
>

References:
- [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
  - From: Lenard Lindstrom
- Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
  - From: Joe Strout
- Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
  - From: Greg Ewing
- Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
  - From: Joe Strout

Prev by Author: Re: [pygame] Text at an angle
Next by Author: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
Previous by thread: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
Next by thread: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread