[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pygame] Automated Builds of pygame from latest in SVN
- To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [pygame] Automated Builds of pygame from latest in SVN
- From: "Brian Fisher" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:01:07 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:01:12 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=EGllqSZJKKtC/bzxItc6wsG8nAHkhq6wstYDEv1kWuM=; b=TTHRysYkxQFfchC/vKi+X7ymDdztoEE8sdkT7HXDEquNOCEaLHSnTCqZcK2p+s3CiJvKqFEOIe906O2DxDgcK9KzWJ1NOAyulTiOYIKfZOuEp9xAVekBbCNdtP0jwIGFu0kAEutvdRkvfVgMAzOIBYdi6zAp9cPIFyQO8JnNJps=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=gMgkZOMCNxDRPHrbwS42OcOqFZY85dPYhU/6gQD7OCgF3eO3DKycJQUTHqUvQ7ucOMakWesqD8t1ZQ7rkpUNpzzFXa2tByrea3ZEUop31c6IrTWgI2nrZCKpXT7wJNKjhRJu5IcGpgpoGGCyxY8zKJI876qCNyiGMt0UaPy6eU4=
- In-reply-to: <47B79B6B.6070400@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <e55f7e400802161354n19181d2dsc540e55cbb15f6f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47B79B6B.6070400@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
The automated build for win32 is using the prebuilts you gave me a
link for on the mailing list. Getting dependencies to feed to the
automated builds is still very manual.
I don't know how much benefit there is with a particular optimization
level with gcc. I actually wonder if there might be an even bigger
difference between ms compilers and gcc?
On Feb 16, 2008 6:26 PM, Lenard Lindstrom <len-l@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wow, that just made my life easier. Which version of the dependencies
> are you using, the prebuilts I supplied, or the latest taken from the
> r1110 installer? I believe the prebuilts use the latest library
> versions. But the build script now consistently builds everything with
> an optimization level of -02 (default, adjustable), while those in the
> prebuilts basically used the defaults provided by the configure scripts.
> Does this matter?
>
> Lenard
>
>
> Brian Fisher wrote:
> > For people who are interested in testing with the bleeding edge of
> > pygame development (like say testing/confirming if some bug you care
> > about is fixed), I've set up automated pygame installer building for
> > win32 and mac OS X on python 2.4 & 2.5
> > http://thorbrian.com/pygame/builds.php
> >
> > Scripts run every 4 hours and rebuild if SVN has changed. If the
> > builds pass the pygame unit-tests, the installer is uploaded. If the
> > builds didn't pass or failed to build the errors are listed.
> >
> > You can tell if your pygame was installed with one of these installers
> > because pygame.ver reports the svn revision they were build with in
> > the form: -svnXXXX, and if you are reporting a bug with one of these
> > installers, please supply that ver string.
> >
> > I am very interested in feedback of how to make this more useful for
> > anyone who is interested in utilizing it.
> >
>
>