Re: [school-discuss] Phase I ISO Evals: intranet, courseware and some others

[mike eschman <meschman@etc-edu.com>]

couldn't read your mime format e-mail.


On Sunday 16 February 2003 07:58 am, David Bucknell wrote:
. This message is in MIME format.
.
. ---MOQ104536784956518c65920bfe71ab673ccdea733303
. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
.
. Since the intranet category is full of course builders and tools for
 courses, I . have felt it unavoidable while looking at intranets to look at
 apps that are . primarily in the courseware category. I suggest that we
 separate them in the . future. I know that when I submitted Manhattan, I was
 worried that it would be . overlooked when users were looking at intranets,
 so I included it in that . secondary category. Reading through the apps now,
 however, I find that this . cross-indexing is more confusing than helpful.
 So, I have, in the attached html . page, suggested recategorizing apps:
.
. *intranet-groupware (may contain couse builders, but may not -- perhaps
 more . valuable if they do)
. *course builders (courses that would fit within an intranet/extranet. They
 may . have many features of an intranet, but are primarily course builders)
 . *courseware (tools that would fit inside a course)
.
. There are a couple of other categories in there, too.
.
. If I have not colored the row, it's because my findings are too
 inconclusive to . report anything at all.
.

-- 
(http://www.etc-edu.com ) Not just an afterthought ...