[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SEUL: Re: What's the diff to SEUL ?

To: Chris Barker <cbarker@ce.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: SEUL: Re: What's the diff to SEUL ?
From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 12:00:48 -0800 (PST)
cc: kde-distribution@thunder.dorm.duke.edu, seul-project@seul.org
In-Reply-To: <34BFBB8A.3B25BB00@ce.berkeley.edu>
Sender: owner-seul-project@seul.org
To-Get-Off-This-List: mail majordomo@seul.org, body unsubscribe seul-project

On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, Chris Barker wrote:

> > At a certain point, e-Linux and SEUL will start going their own ways, given
> > that e-Linux intends to use KDE (I still don't understand why).
> 
> Because it's there! Of everything I've seen, and I scan the web
> regularly, it absolutely the best and most complete desktop available.
> It's actually usable NOW. GNOME has a long way to go, but I hope it gets
> there, and e-linux may switch over when it's done. If e-linux and SEUL
> use the same basic distibution, the two could merge easily in the
> future.
> 
> -Chris

And their instance on usinmg KDE will absolutely kill the product. It will
prevent anyone from selling their distribution and will prevent all but
the large companies from developing packages for it.

What is wrong with fvwm2 and fvwm-buttons?

George Bonser 
If NT is the answer, you didn't understand the question. (NOTE: Stolen sig)
http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SEUL: Re: What's the diff to SEUL ?
  - From: Chris Barker <cbarker@ce.berkeley.edu>

References:
- SEUL: Re: What's the diff to SEUL ?
  - From: Chris Barker <cbarker@ce.berkeley.edu>

Prev by Date: SEUL: Re: What's the diff to SEUL ?
Next by Date: Re: SEUL: Re: SEUL distribution?
Prev by thread: SEUL: Re: What's the diff to SEUL ?
Next by thread: Re: SEUL: Re: What's the diff to SEUL ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread