Re: [tor-relays] Consensus weight dropped

[Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/01/15 06:03, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> 
> On 21 Jan 2015, at 05:10, eric gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Holy crap, 40%? And that's been historically acceptable?
> 
> I don't think it was historically like that.

Actually, it's not that bad:

https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/bwauths-2015-01-21.png

That graph shows that most relays have been measured by either 4 or 5
bandwidth authorities in the past weeks.  Only relays with 0, 1, or 2
measurements had their consensus weight fraction set to almost 0.  But
it's far less than 40% of relays.  I assume that's natural churn in
the network.

Seems like the two relays mentioned on this list have some other
issue.  Ideas, anyone?

All the best,
Karsten

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUv4C4AAoJEJd5OEYhk8hICKYH/21kTHfZ0pG0L/OiFBrbTFy3
bNAPYeTa1AAJb0PHpweKn7gX9pBheKwCDzd36Nk8cWhkYJ/QmrumE2IXxoFTGT3L
X++MCTxqtnN+XDqNlNdgyAfYVAk/jG7RtqxSzxDFTl3BSW18t8KwbOGokuWluAI+
Zp7Oo33Rmvk3/Jmgc4Ht364esrLXyFpO2SBdGCzSLLtSkPATIMrnhBx5ruDpWGcg
4wD5tNzztfBfrc7vSVwJXLTfAmJOZmaH7nBRS8CRhOlQ9x6/FBW8unSf8bD75+O7
mMep1/k2QJlTwbU9ydySgx4crwO1b5bLKOoD8kYme3TDM6qjZ5cpcETpiR01vUM=
=CefK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays