Re: [tor-relays] Consensus weight dropped

[Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/01/15 11:54, Network Operations Center wrote:
> My dropping consensus overlaps exactly with the blue line on that
> graph time-wise. The 1 Month Graph shows this pretty well.
> 
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3D7E274A87D9A89AF064C13D1EE4CA1F184F2600
>
> 
> 
> It feels as if I am almost completely dependent on that blue node, 
> although since one needs multiple measures, it shouldn't be
> possible.

Ah, sorry for being unclear.  The blue line is not bandwidth authority
number 4, it's the number of relays for which there are measurements
from 4 bandwidth authorities.

But here's another graph, specifically for your relay schokomilch:

https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/schokomilch-cw-2015-01-21.png

14C1 is tor26, 4901 is maatuska, and D586 is moria1.  It looks like
maatuska stopped measuring your relay between December 29 and January
5, which is a general problem with maatuska's scanner, not specific to
your relay, AFAIK.

And unrelated to this, neither gabelmoo nor longclaw ever measured
your relay.  I'd say this is something to investigate and then fix.

All the best,
Karsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUv5oBAAoJEJd5OEYhk8hIqgkIAKE82nkthE5OEIGxBtgtqKdd
cB8Kq2BdgGSq6kYi7CF6EclJuc7mhEBHkfhYiWTyCE/yhXyg7hFkyiL3rr9qGVtE
gBxoJqX8OgmdoV9c74Ao83qU130SQ4BArYgFwqmC64tvSpe4jl6tiFddndF5MomC
4YH0Nuw6VnxUTPcG2ZiRjab5sZcpJ4YLJzBmbjB1oXRy2UaRQOTT2o1Cz65fBIt3
4lCW9lMTfxn4G3JUEO2Pj1rTgyoKM3U7spv/IdyrmQmK+wwzKCDRIxkWAIDbM2Rw
lOEwNz3rodsIksgyZk/oOPA/NiJUaKEWKX7DR2D2rBhCIuRamV6np1b5oE2uRjU=
=BhVW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays