-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/15 06:03, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
On 21 Jan 2015, at 05:10, eric gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Holy crap, 40%? And that's been historically acceptable?
I don't think it was historically like that.
Actually, it's not that bad:
https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/bwauths-2015-01-21.png
That graph shows that most relays have been measured by either 4 or 5
bandwidth authorities in the past weeks. Only relays with 0, 1, or 2
measurements had their consensus weight fraction set to almost 0. But
it's far less than 40% of relays. I assume that's natural churn in
the network.
Seems like the two relays mentioned on this list have some other
issue. Ideas, anyone?
All the best,
Karsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUv4C4AAoJEJd5OEYhk8hICKYH/21kTHfZ0pG0L/OiFBrbTFy3
bNAPYeTa1AAJb0PHpweKn7gX9pBheKwCDzd36Nk8cWhkYJ/QmrumE2IXxoFTGT3L
X++MCTxqtnN+XDqNlNdgyAfYVAk/jG7RtqxSzxDFTl3BSW18t8KwbOGokuWluAI+
Zp7Oo33Rmvk3/Jmgc4Ht364esrLXyFpO2SBdGCzSLLtSkPATIMrnhBx5ruDpWGcg
4wD5tNzztfBfrc7vSVwJXLTfAmJOZmaH7nBRS8CRhOlQ9x6/FBW8unSf8bD75+O7
mMep1/k2QJlTwbU9ydySgx4crwO1b5bLKOoD8kYme3TDM6qjZ5cpcETpiR01vUM=
=CefK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays